Thursday, 27 June 2013

Squeezing the Limen


Countryside Column for 17 May 2013 under headline:

Shrinking river was ideal incentive for smugglers


I very nearly toppled out of a dinghy the other day.  And given the trouble Myrtle had scrabbling up the muddy bank after retrieving a stick, I might have been in the water for some time.

It was the river Limen, and my alter ego, 18th century smuggler Gabriel Tomkins, complete with tricorn hat, sword and pistol, was at Newenden for a publicity shoot. It’s for a forthcoming Smuggler Tales event onboard the boat that chugs passengers up to Bodiam or down towards Rye.

Alert readers may be expostulating that the river there, separating Kent from East Sussex, is not the Limen but the Rother.  And so it is now. But up until about 1600 it was known by its Latin name.   And a very different river it was too.  Not the narrow ditch-like stream with stepped high banks of today,  but a vastly wide,  tidal waterway that was the artery of the Weald.

Its importance dates from a thousand years before the Romans, when the Belgae arrived from the Rhineland in search of industrial opportunity.  For them the Limen was the only route into the dark interior of the Wealden forest. They were seeking a strange mineral - iron ore - and they found it in abundance in the local sedimentary rock. They also found quantities of the two other requisites for smelting iron – clay for the kiln and wood for the charcoal to fire it.

Tony Cardwell’s excellent history “Limen” shows that extensive iron working in and around the valley continued right into the 18th century.  Then, with the river silting up and the forest denuded, hammer mills at places like Wadhurst, Hawkhurst and, finally, Robertsbridge closed for good.

That contributed to the serious unemployment already created by the shifting river landlocking ports like Smallhythe and Rye. With the government levying swingeing import taxes on tea and tobacco and brandy, opportunity knocked for smugglers like Tomkins with his Mayfield and Hawkhurst gangs.
They would likely have used the Limen/Rother to move their tubs inland, while redundant watermen at Rye and Winchelsea would have leapt at the chance to earn the odd florin or crown helping bring the smuggled goods ashore.

Viewing the emasculated Rother today from an unstable rowing boat it’s hard to  imagine the mighty Limen spread out across the whole valley with a multitude of craft servicing our own local iron industry.

Read previous columns at: kentcountrymatters.blogspot.co.uk



Giving the lie to localism?


Courier Countryside Column for 21 June 2013 under headline:


Post office shake-up may spell end for village shops

The future of our village shop hangs in the balance. The current owners want to sell up, but finding someone new to take over has proved problematic. Part of the difficulty is down to a major reorganisation of sub-post offices which will have far-reaching implications for dozens of villages in the south east and in the country at large.

Currently the postal part is a separate entity within a village store. The postmaster - often the shopkeeper - is paid a retainer plus a percentage of sales. This can typically amount to some £10,000 a year. Hardly enough for a post office to survive entirely separately, but an important additional income for a small shop.

Now, however, Post Office Ltd is embarked on a massive restructuring known as Network Transformation.  Over the next two years 2000 sub-post offices will become ‘Locals’. The separate ‘fortress’ position will disappear and transactions will take place over the counter, alongside shop sales. The Local will be stripped of many roles, including handling international parcels and domestic ones over 20kg.  The ability to pay bills manually will go, as will passport, car tax and DVLA services. And, most importantly, the retainer paid to the shopkeeper will also disappear.

Quite apart from the potential inconvenience for customers of mixing post office transactions with shop sales at busy times, it seems likely that the reduction in revenue could be the nail in the coffin of many rural stores. Post Office Ltd argue that the loss of retainer could be made up from increased sales as the new Local will be open whenever the shop is, including possibly evenings and weekends. Shopkeepers I know say there’s no demand for longer opening hours in small villages and they wouldn’t be economic.

As a boy I had the choice of a dedicated post office plus three village shops. Recently our parish council, reluctantly, supported plans for the last but one of those to change to residential.  

Everyone agrees the sole remaining shop forms an important part of the community and is vital for the elderly and people without cars. But it’s already touch and go whether it will survive. Without the post office revenue, its chances could be further diminished. Perhaps central government should start to see small rural post offices as an indispensible social resource rather than purely profit centres.

www.kentcountrymatters.blogspot.co.uk

Tuesday, 11 June 2013

The field before the festival



See www.solparty.org.uk

Kentish Chainsaw Massacre


Courier Countryside Column for June 7th.

Under title:  Chainsaw Whine was least of my worries

It was the chainsaws shattering the Sunday morning peace that alerted us.

We were holding our annual tennis tournament and around 30 people were sitting in the sun awaiting their turn on court. And the infuriating whine just went on and on…

Eventually I rose to remonstrate.  And got a terrible shock. I’d known an ancient apple orchard was hidden behind a high hedge opposite.  I’d even thought how sad to leave these superb trees unpruned, but was consoled by the wonderful wildlife habitat they provided.

Now they were not just pruning, or even pollarding. It looked like they were massacring the entire orchard. Two teams with chainsaws and tractors were systematically felling tree after tree.

The contractors turned out to be perfectly reasonable about the noise and agreed to postpone work until a weekday. So peace was restored and tennis resumed. But surely, I thought, you can’t just destroy a whole orchard of 40 or 50 year-old full standard apple trees?  You’d need a licence wouldn’t you?  I mean I grow a few willows commercially - Salix Alba Caeruleas.  And even though they are planted specifically to make cricket bats you still have to have a license to fell them.

The Forestry Commission’s website is clear: “You normally need permission from us to fell growing trees.” But a little later: “felling carried out without a licence is an offence unless covered by an exemption.” And of course you’ve guessed it - fruit trees in garden or orchard are exempt.

But why?  It’s crazy. All conservation and wildlife organisations agree that traditional orchards are vital havens of biodiversity, yet we’ve lost more than 60% of them in the past five decades. Community orchards like the one I’m involved with are desperately trying to stem the tide. But elsewhere we fail utterly to protect what we have left.

Perhaps, I thought, the council’s Tree Officer would be able to slap a Preservation Order on them?  It’s not that straightforward with commercial orchards, he told me. Fruit trees are exempt from TPOs.  A farmer has to be allowed to profit from his land. He’d look into it but was doubtful.

So by the time you read this another important part of our rural heritage will likely be gone. To add insult to injury, as they were exterminated, the trees were resplendent in full spring blossom.




Tuesday, 28 May 2013

Who owns the Parish Pump?


Courier Countryside Column for 24th May

So who exactly owns the Parish Pump?

It’s extraordinary how you can live in a village for years and still have little idea of how it actually works.  You may know there is a village shop and a pub or two.  But say you’re watching cricket on the green and glance at the church clock to see if it’s still ten-to-three, do you ever think who owns the green?  Or who pays for repairs to the clock?
For most people this may not much matter. The green has always been there and will probably go on being there.  But suddenly for me it’s of consuming interest.  My village has just embarked on a Parish Plan. This is a government backed initiative to enable local people to determine how they would like their community to develop over the next ten years and more. The steering committee thought a good first step would be to find out what ‘assets’ the village had, who owns them and who runs them.  And then they handed the task to me.
Some things are clear.  The main village hall is owned and run by a charity whose sole trustee is the Parish Council.  But there are two other smaller community halls. One is owned by the church even though it was built by public subscription.  But I don’t know whether it’s run by the parochial church council or another committee. The other hall or pavilion is even more of a mystery.  And dotted around the village are various small parcels of land whose title is obscure.  Who, for instance, owns the little triangle on which the war memorial sits? Or the land housing the two parish pumps?
Does the cricket club pay rent to use the village green and if so to whom? I believe there is a separate committee that ‘runs’ the green, even though the Parish Council is responsible for maintenance.
So far we’ve discovered twenty separate charities or charitable trusts operating within the parish, mostly for the direct benefit of villagers.  And that doesn’t include the twenty-five different clubs or organisations you could join.  Most are run by committees meaning there could easily be two hundred and fifty people serving on them.  That’s getting on for 20% of the village population directly involved in some aspect of running it.
Now I have to discover who owns the church clock. I understand it may be the village not the church.  But I’ve no idea why.




Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Uninvited House Guests


Courier Countryside Column May 10 under headline:  

I'm not letting wildlife I share this home with drive me bats

 
If you live in an old house in the country you get used to sharing it with an extensive assortment of creatures and insects.
Our place was built around 1480 making it - as I never tire of telling - Plantagenet rather than Tudor. Since Richard III was dethroned, countless generations and a wide variety of spider species have made it their home. It’s definitely no place for arachnophobes.
Indeed in spring it’s no place for anyone of a nervous disposition. Birds nesting under the eaves make extraordinarily loud scrapings and scufflings in the early hours. Until I put a mesh over the top of the chimneystack, a succession of starlings filled the flues with twigs and moss resulting in smoke blowing back and filling rooms. Cleaning the chimney became an annual penance with sackfulls of debris to be removed.
Mice, too, regard the house as their own des res. Since the cat died they’ve become ever bolder in their nesting choices and they seem as oblivious to the dog as Myrtle is to them. I feel bad about evicting them, but am annoyed when they chomp their way through my larder or rip up perfectly good picnic rugs in the loft.
Until last year the attic was also home to not one but two sets of bats. I’m no chiroptophobe – in fact I’m quite fond of their furry bodies and umbrella-like wings, but two complete colonies did make an awful mess. The carpet of droppings was bad enough, but the ammonia odor of urine was worse.
We once called in the local bat protection society to identify them. The chaiman turned out to be called Robin, which rather upset Mrs B’s little Batman joke. He spent a good deal of time rubbing droppings between finger and thumb and sniffing the result to analyse their diet.  Eventually he pronounced one lot common pipistrelles: a bit disappointing – you don’t want plebby bats in your house do you? But the second colony was the rarer brown long-ear.  Anyway, after using the place as a toilet for a decade, they upped and left. Whenever I go up there I still shine the torch at the apex hoping to see that mass of little brown bodies suspended upside-down, undulating gently.
I found some droppings outside the back door today so they clearly haven’t moved far.